WordPress runs a huge share of the web and can be made to do almost anything. Ghost does one thing — publishing — and does it without the assembly. Here is how they actually compare if writing is the point.
At a glance
| Ghost | WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Publishing and newsletters | Anything |
| Out of the box | Editor, memberships, SEO, themes | A blog you extend with plugins |
| Typical plugins needed | 0–2 | 5–15 |
| Performance | Fast by default | Depends on your plugin stack |
| Maintenance | Ghost updates | Core, themes and every plugin |
| Security surface | Small | Large, mostly via plugins |
| Ecommerce | Not its job | Excellent (WooCommerce) |
| Learning curve | Low | Low to start, grows |
Where Ghost genuinely wins
It is fast without you doing anything. A default Ghost install is quick because there is less of it. A default WordPress install is quick too — it is the seventh plugin that slows it down, and that is the install most people end up with.
Memberships and paid subscriptions are built in. No plugin, no integration. This is Ghost's strongest single feature and it is native.
Maintenance is one thing, not fifteen. Updating Ghost is one operation. A WordPress site with a dozen plugins has a dozen independent update streams, each of which can break the others.
The editor is better for long-form writing. This is subjective and most writers who switch say the same thing.
SEO is sensible by default. Clean markup, sane URLs, automatic sitemaps, structured data. WordPress needs a plugin to reach the same baseline.
Where WordPress genuinely wins
Being fair here matters more than being persuasive.
- You need a shop. WooCommerce is mature and Ghost is not trying to compete. Not close.
- You need arbitrary functionality. Booking systems, forums, directories, complex forms — there is a WordPress plugin, and there is no Ghost equivalent.
- You need many contributors with fine-grained roles. WordPress's permission model is far more granular.
- You already have a working WordPress site and a person who maintains it. "It works" beats "it is more elegant" every time.
The honest trade
Ghost's constraint is the feature. You cannot bolt fifteen things onto it, which is why it stays fast and why maintenance stays boring. If that constraint fits what you are building, Ghost is better. If you will fight it within six months, WordPress is better, and switching later costs more than choosing correctly now.
A useful test: write down everything your site must do in a year. If it is "publish writing, maybe charge for some of it", choose Ghost. If the list includes a store, a booking form or a member directory, choose WordPress.
Cost
Both are free software; you pay for hosting.
- Ghost hosting: $5–25/month managed. Ours is $5–12 — see pricing.
- WordPress hosting: $3–30/month, plus premium plugins, which is where budgets grow.
The full cost breakdown covers the line items both platforms share, including email.
Switching from WordPress
Ghost ships a WordPress import that handles posts, pages and images. Expect to redo your theme — themes do not port — and to plan your URL structure so existing links keep working.
FAQ
Is Ghost better than WordPress?
For publishing writing, Ghost is generally better: it is faster by default, has memberships and SEO built in, and needs far less maintenance. WordPress is better when you need functionality beyond publishing, such as ecommerce, booking systems or complex forms.
Is Ghost faster than WordPress?
A default Ghost install is faster than a typical real-world WordPress install, mainly because WordPress sites accumulate plugins. A carefully built, minimal WordPress site with good caching can match Ghost — most WordPress sites are not that.
Can I migrate from WordPress to Ghost?
Yes. Ghost includes a WordPress importer that brings across posts, pages and images. Your theme will not transfer, and you should map your old URLs so existing links and search rankings survive.
Does Ghost need plugins like WordPress?
No. The features most WordPress sites add plugins for — SEO, memberships, subscriptions, a decent editor — are part of Ghost itself. Ghost has integrations rather than a plugin architecture, which is why its maintenance and security surface stay small.
Is Ghost good for SEO?
Yes. Ghost produces clean markup, sensible URLs, automatic sitemaps and structured data without a plugin, which puts it at or above a WordPress site running an SEO plugin, with less configuration.
Decided on Ghost? We host it, unmodified, one isolated container per site. See the plans or read how it works.